Cannabis in India — Bhang, the Vedas & the Soma Question
Three thousand years of cannabis culture on the subcontinent — but the popular story skips the centuries-long gap between the Vedas and the first uncontested medical reference.

India's relationship with cannabis is among the oldest and most continuous in the world. The Atharva Veda names bhaṅga as one of five sacred plants. Bhang, ganja, and charas remain embedded in religious practice, folk medicine, and daily life across much of the subcontinent. But the popular narrative — that ancient Vedic sages used cannabis medicinally and that Shiva has always been the "Lord of Bhang" — compresses a complex history and projects medieval developments backward onto Vedic antiquity.
The Atharva Veda: bhaṅga among the sacred plants
Atharva Veda names bhaṅga
Book 11, Hymn 6, Verse 15 of the Atharva Veda (Ralph Griffith translation) lists bhaṅga among five sacred plants. This is the earliest known textual reference to cannabis on the Indian subcontinent. The context is ritual and protective — the plants are invoked to release from distress — not medical.
The Vedic reference is genuine and significant, but its meaning requires care. The Atharva Veda is a collection of hymns, spells, and incantations. The mention of bhaṅga appears in a ritual context — the plant is named among sacred herbs invoked for protection. This is not a pharmacological text, and reading modern medical-marijuana advocacy into a Bronze Age hymn misrepresents both the Veda and the history.
The gap: Vedic mention to medical use
Between the Atharva Veda's ritual reference and the first uncontested Indian medical description of cannabis lies a gap of roughly two thousand years. Popular accounts typically skip this gap entirely, moving directly from "ancient Vedic medicine" to medieval practice as though the tradition were continuous. The evidence does not support that narrative.
First uncontested Indian medical reference
The Chikitsa-sara-sangraha of Vangasena provides the first uncontested Indian medical reference to drug-type cannabis. Earlier Ayurvedic texts mention hemp, but whether they refer to psychoactive preparations or to the fiber plant remains debated among scholars.
This does not mean Indians were unaware of cannabis's psychoactive properties for two millennia. It means the documentary evidence for systematic medical use begins much later than popular accounts suggest. The distinction matters for anyone interested in what the sources actually say rather than what we wish they said.
Bhang, ganja, charas: a typology
Indian cannabis culture developed a three-part classification system that persists to this day:
- Bhang — a preparation made from the leaves and seeds of the cannabis plant, typically ground into a paste and mixed into drinks (notably thandai) or edibles. The mildest of the three forms.
- Ganja — the flowering tops of the female plant, smoked or prepared for smoking. Significantly more potent than bhang.
- Charas — hand-rubbed resin collected from living plants, equivalent to hashish. The most concentrated form.
This typology was formalized in British colonial documentation but reflects categories that long predated British arrival. Each form occupied a distinct social and ritual niche, and Indian law — both precolonial and colonial — often regulated them differently.
Shiva as "Lord of Bhang"
This is not a debunking of the religious practice itself — bhang is genuinely sacred in Shaiva tradition, and its use during Holi and Mahashivaratri is a living and meaningful religious expression. The correction is chronological: this tradition is medieval, not Vedic, and claiming otherwise distorts both Hindu religious history and the history of cannabis.
The Soma question
The Soma-as-cannabis hypothesis appeals to those who want to place psychoactive cannabis at the very center of Vedic religion. But the Rigveda's descriptions of Soma — pressed between stones, yielding a tawny juice, growing in the mountains — do not match cannabis preparation or morphology. The hypothesis has been rejected by the mainstream of Indological scholarship, which favors ephedra or acknowledges that the identity of Soma may be irrecoverable.
The Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, 1894
Indian Hemp Drugs Commission report
The British colonial government commissioned the most comprehensive study of cannabis use ever undertaken to that date. Over seven volumes, the Commission examined production, consumption, social effects, and medical impacts of bhang, ganja, and charas across British India. It interviewed nearly 1,200 witnesses.
The moderate use of hemp drugs produces no injurious effects on the mind... Moderation does not lead to excess in hemp any more than it does in alcohol.
Indian Hemp Drugs Commission Report, 1894, Chapter XIV
The Commission's conclusion — that moderate cannabis use was essentially harmless and that prohibition would be unjustifiable — was ignored by the same imperial government that commissioned it. Forty-three years later, Britain would support international cannabis prohibition at the 1925 Geneva Convention. The Commission report stands as one of the most thorough and most disregarded drug-policy studies in history.
What the Indian record establishes
India's cannabis history is genuinely deep, culturally rich, and significant. The documented record supports:
- c. 1500–1000 BCE: Vedic-period awareness of cannabis as a sacred plant (Atharva Veda).
- 11th century CE: First uncontested medical reference in the Chikitsa-sara-sangraha.
- Medieval period: Development of the Shiva-bhang association and the bhang-ganja-charas typology.
- 1894: The Indian Hemp Drugs Commission finds moderate use harmless — and is ignored.
The gap between sacred mention and documented medical use is not a weakness in the record. It is the record. Honest history does not require filling gaps with assumptions.
For in-depth cannabis education, dosing guides, safety information, and research summaries, visit our partner site TryCannabis.org